From strategy deck to working software
in 60 days.
Most $2M AI strategy engagements end with a brilliant deck and no working software. Xamun closes the gap. Half-day Discovery. 21-day build. Business outcome measured at 60 days. One vendor accountable for the result.
The consultant paradox at the heart of every failed transformation
Strategy firms produce decks. The deck is good. The slides are sharp. The roadmap is logical. But the firm that wrote it doesn't build software. So the deck gets handed to a different vendor — an IT services firm at $200/hour — to translate the strategy into systems.
By the time the systems are scoped, the market has moved. By the time they're built, the strategy is stale. By the time anyone measures whether the outcome landed, the consultants are gone and the engineers are on a different project. Strategy and execution were never connected. They were stapled.
The result: $2M spent on strategy, more spent on build, and a transformation programme that meets none of the original objectives.
Three phases. One vendor. One outcome.
Strategy and execution under one accountable system, on a mid-market timeline.
Half-day session. XI has already pre-read the business. Walk out with an Opportunity Map, Found Budget, and Transformation Roadmap. The metric is named.
Software Factory ships the first AI system in ~21 days under the peer-reviewed xDD methodology. Quality-gated. Code owned by the client from Day 1.
Adoption tracked. Business metric monitored. Outcome reported against plan. Next cycle's intelligence already accumulating.
$2M strategy engagement vs $2,500 Discovery
Side-by-side: traditional AI strategy consulting versus the Xamun closed loop.
See the full comparison vs Management Consulting, Enterprise AI Platforms, IT Services →
Frequently asked questions about AI strategy execution
What is the AI strategy execution gap?
The structural failure between AI strategy work (a deck) and AI software delivery (a system). Strategy firms produce decks; engineering firms build what the deck specifies; neither owns the outcome. Most AI Transformation initiatives die in this gap.
How does Xamun close the gap?
One closed loop. XI runs the diagnostic in half a day. The Software Factory ships the system in 21 days. Outcome governance tracks the business metric continuously. One vendor, one accountable system, no handoff.
How is Discovery different from a McKinsey engagement?
McKinsey: 3-6 months, $500K-$2M, output is a strategic deck. Xamun Discovery: half a day, $2,500, output is an Opportunity Map plus Found Budget plus Transformation Roadmap — and the team that diagnosed it also builds the software.
Can Xamun replace traditional management consulting?
For mid-market AI Transformation, yes. Xamun delivers comparable strategic intelligence (continuously, via XI), the actual software (via the Factory), and outcome governance (via the Dashboard) at mid-market price points. Big-firm consulting remains relevant for enterprise-scale organisational design.
Related insights
Stop buying decks. Start shipping software.
Half a day to a diagnosed opportunity. Three weeks to working software. Sixty days to a measured outcome.